Why the multisensory approach works better for dyslexic English as an additional language learners than regular, evidence-based intervention strategies designed for native speaker children

Why the multisensory approach works better for dyslexic English as an additional language learners than regular, evidence-based intervention strategies designed for native speaker children
Why the multisensory approach works better for dyslexic English as an additional language (EAL) learners than regular, evidence-based intervention strategies designed for native speaker childrenI don’t need introduction and conclusion as it is only part of a much longer, already written paper.What I need is the following:
Part 1 (500 words) critically evaluate and analyse one evidence-based intervention for dyslexic learners from the following list:
http://www.interventionsforliteracy.org.uk/home/interventions/list-view
and compare it with the multisensory approach (strengths and shortcomings and reasons why such intervention strategies do not work with EAL learners)
Part 2 (700 words) discuss how to plan and implement a whole school approach to best support the students with dyslexia and literacy difficulties (set in the wider policy context, national (Malaysian) and international policy, what are some key issues and how these will be addressed, how the whole school approach will be implemented)
The plan needs to be justified with reference to the relevant literature.
Part 3. (700 words) What are the key challenges and barriers to a whole school approach – refer to relevant research and reflect on how these might be overcome

FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENTS TO BE DONE AT A CHEAPER PRICE PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US NOW