Home / Essays / CSCI 6632/3326 | Algorithms | 16 Fall

CSCI 6632/3326 | Algorithms | 16 Fall

CSCI 6632/3326 | Algorithms | 16 Fall


Please read the policy on plagiarism and on homework guidelines(in the course outline handed out on the rst
day) and remember that I enforce that policy.
Email submissions will not be accepted.

The extra credit problems are to be done on separate sheets of paper and handed in near the end of the trimester.
The programming problems will require you to turn in your program on blackboard, details to follow later.

Whenever you presenting an algorithm, remember that you should rst give a short (2-3 lines) description of the
main idea behind the algorithm before you get into the details of the pseudocode.

If you are going to be using an algorithm discussed in class or the textbook (eg: Insertion Sort) you don’t have
to write the pseudocode for that algorithm; you can just refer to it by name.

Quiz 1 (open book, open notes) will be on 09/27/16 Tuesday and will cover those topics from the following list
which we cover in Weeks 1, 2, 3.
Preliminaries:
Review of elementary math concepts: logarithmic and exponential functions, , , Algorithms:
how to specify, correctness, eciency, worst case, average case and best case analysis, order of growth, big-oh
O
() notation { Chapters 1 and 3. Sorting:
Insertion Sort { Chapter 2. () and () notation { 3.1. Merge Sort
{ 2.3. Counting Sort { 8.2. Review of elementary math concepts: permutations and combinations, proof by
induction, proof by contradiction.
1. (20 points)
(a) Suppose a sorting algorithm takes 2 seconds to sort 100 items. How much time in seconds will the same
algorithm take to sort 500 items if the number of operations the algorithm performs is exactly
n
2
.
(b) Suppose algorithm
A
takes 100
n
log
2
n
time and algorithm
B
takes 10
n
2
time. What is the smallest value
of
n
(assuming
n >
2) for which
A
will be faster than
B
? It may be dicult to do an exact calculation
here; if so, try to give an approximate answer.
(c) For each of the following, indicate whether the statement is true or false (no explanations necessary):
i. 5
n
3
+ 2
n
+ 3 is
O
(
n
3
).
ii.
n
3
is
O
(log
2
n
).
iii. 2
n
5
is
O
(
n
2
).
iv. 6
n
5
is
O
(2
n
).
v. 100
n
3
+ 3
n
is
O
(
n
4
).
(d) If
p
(
n
) and
q
(
n
) are two functions such that
p
(
n
) is
O
(
q
(
n
)), does this always mean that for every value
of
n
,
p
(
n
)

q
(
n
)? If you think the answer is yes, give a justi cation. If you think the answer is no, give
a counterexample i.e. nd two functions
p
(
n
) and
q
(
n
) and a number
y
such that
p
(
n
) is
O
(
q
(
n
)) and
p
(
y
)
> q
(
y
).
2. (10 points)
(a) Trace insertion sort on the list 5
;
8
;
2
;
6
;
9
;
3. i.e. show what the list looks like after each iteration of the
outer loop. Also, calculate the exact number of total data comparisons made. Note that a data comparison
is when two di erent pieces of data are compared, and not when loop variables etc are compared.
(b) Trace the merge algorithm (not the complete merge sort) on the two lists 2
;
3
;
7
;
14 and 1
;
5
;
8
;
20. Show
what the combined list (i.e. the merged list) looks like after every step and also calculate the exact number
of total data comparisons made.
3. (10 points) Consider the following sorting algorithm (the UNH sort) to sort an array
A
[1
::n
].
for i = n-1 downto 1 do
for j = 1 to i do
if A[j] > A[j+1] then
swap(A[j],A[j+1])
(a) Trace this sorting algorithm on the list 5
;
8
;
2
;
6
;
9
;
3. i.e. show what the list looks like after each iteration
of the outer loop. Also, calculate the exact number of total data comparisons made.
(b) As we did with insertion sort in class, do a worst case analysis (use big O notation) of the running time of
this algorithm. You don’t have to give any explanations here – just state your answer.
(c) As we did with insertion sort in class, do a best case analysis (use big O notation) of the running time of
this algorithm. You don’t have to give any explanations here – just state your answer.
4. (20 points)
Let
A
and
B
be two
sorted
arrays, each with
n
elements. You have to write an
ecient
algorithm which nds
out if
A
and
B
have any elements in common.
For example if
A
= [4
;
7
;
12
;
15] ;
B = [2,4,6,23000] the answer should be yes (since 4 is an element in common),
if
A
= [4
;
7
;
900] ;
B = [2,3, 28] the answer should be no. In terms of eciency, the faster your algorithm is, the
better.

You will get full credit if your algorithm is correct and works in time
O
(
n
).

You will get substantial partial credit if your algorithm is correct and works in time smaller than
O
(
n
2
)
but bigger than
O
(
n
).

You will get some partial credit if your algorithm is correct and works in time
O
(
n
2
).
(a) Give a clear description of your algorithm for the above problem.
(b) Trace how your algorithm works on the above two examples.
(c) Do a worst case time analysis (use big O notation) of your algorithm.
5. (20 points) Let
A
[1],
A
[2],
: : :
,
A
[
n
], be
n
integers (possibly with repetitions) in the range 1
: : : k
i.e. all the
entries of the array
A
are between 1 and
k
. You want to repeatedly answer range queries of the form [
a; b
] where
1

a

b

k
; each range query asks how many
A
[
i
]’s are in the range
a : : : b
, i.e., how many numbers from
A
lie
between
a
and
b
. For example, if
k
= 10, and the array
A
has seven elements 5
;
9
;
3
;
5
;
10
;
6
;
1
;
7 the range query
[2
;
7] asks how many numbers are there in the array
A
between 2 and 7, so the answer should be 5 (because the
numbers 3,5,5,6,7 from
A
lie in the range [2
;
7]). You want to do this eciently. In order to do this, you rst do
some preprocessing, which is a one-time operation i.e. you are willing to pay the one-time relatively expensive
cost of doing preprocessing before starting to answer the range queries, in order to save time with the many
range queries which will follow. Your algorithm should work within the following time bounds:

The one time preprocessing step should take
O
(
n
+
k
) time.

Each range query should be answered in
O
(1) (i.e. constant) time i.e. the amount of time to answer the
range query [
a; b
] will be a small number which will in no way depend on
n
,
k
,
A
,
a
,
b
or the number of elements
which actually lie in the range [
a; b
].
(a) Give a clear description of your algorithm for the above problem. This description should include both how
the preprocessing step is carried out, and then how the range queries are answered.
(b) Trace your algorithm on the above example i.e. for the array
A
as above, show what will happen in the
preprocessing step. Then show how the algorithm will answer the range query [2
;
7]. Also show how the
algorithm will answer the range query [1
;
9].
(c) Do a worst case time analysis (use big O notation) of your algorithm i.e. answer the two questions: how
much time does the preprocessing step take and how much time does answering the range query take.
Hint:
Think about counting sort discussed in class and in the textbook. You will need to keep the auxillary
array
C
[1
::k
] we used for counting sort where
C
[
j
] represents the number of elements from
A
which are less than
or equal to
j
. In the above example,
C
[2] will be 1 since there is one element (i.e. 1) in A which is

2;
C
[7] will
be 6 since there are 6 elements (i.e. 1,3,5,5,6,7) which are

7. In class we saw how to ll
C
in time
O
(
n
+
k
)
(this is the preprocessing step), and once the array
C
is available, you should show how to use it to answer range
queries in
O
(1) time.
6. (20 points)
this problem is for CSCI 6632 students only, not for CSCI 3326 students.
In this part you have to come up with an algorithm to answer a more complicated range query, namely, given
an array
A
as above, a range query [
a; b
] now requires you to actually list all of the
A
[
i
]’s in the range
a : : : b
.
Using the same array
A
as above, the range query [2
;
7] asks which numbers from
A
are there in the array
A
are
between 2 and 7, so the answer should be 3,5,5,6,7 (it doesn’t matter in what order the numbers are outputted).
Your algorithm should work within the following time bounds:

The one time preprocessing step should take
O
(
n
+
k
) time (the preprocessing here will be di erent from
that in the rst part).
2

WPMessenger