ASSESSMENT ITEM

2
Due date: 1600hrs AEST on Wednesday 7 October 2015
Weighting: 50%
Length: Approximately 3000 – 3500 words
Objectives This assessment item relates to learning outcomes 5-12 as stated in the course profile and addresses material covered in modules 5-10 (weeks 6-12) of the
course. Answer all questions. Please also note that additional readings relevant to the assignments may be made available to students via the library’s Course
Resources Online system. If so, students will be advised on this on the Moodle-based course website which all students should access on a regular basis.
Question 1 20 Marks
In early January 2015, Smith Mining Ltd (“Smith”), a Queensland based-company entered into a contract, subject to Australian law, with China Aluminium, a Chinese
aluminium processing firm for three 60,000 tonne shipments of high grade aluminium at US $200 per tonne from Queensland in the first weeks of February, May and August
2015 respectively. Under the contract, there was also a $1 million per instalment shipping charge. Each instalment charge was payable a week in advance by Smith
setting up a letter of credit with Brisbane Bank. There was a minimum requirement of a week between payment and the earliest possible date for shipment. Smith was to
self-certify, under the contract, the quality for each shipment. Under the contract each instalment was to be delivered to the port of Dalian, China, by a Smith
chartered shipping carrier at Smith’s expense.
However, subsequent contract execution didn’t conform to the hopeful expectations of either party.
Regarding the first shipment:
 Due to internal delays and errors by Brisbane bank, it was 10 days late with the letter of credit. This cost Smith $20,000 in extra bank costs. It relied on this as
an excuse to delay shipment by 14 days to cover up its own 10 day delay in shipment, caused by plant failure. Due to that plant failure, Smith could only ship 30,000
tonnes. China Aluminium bought the deficit through the China Beijing Metal Exchange (CBMX) at $300 a tonne plus a $150 per tonne shipping charge from a Korean company,
although Happy Mining Ltd, an Australian competitor had offered and was able to arrange a substitute, equivalent delivery within a further fourteen days at no extra
cost and little inconvenience to China Aluminium.
Regarding the second shipment:
 Owing to a tropical cyclone, loading in Queensland was delayed by six days and the ship’s departure was delayed a further four days due to industrial action by the
port workers in Queensland.  Because of a ship loading error at the port, half of the shipment was not of the appropriate quality. Smith identified this
before the ship departed but it delayed the shipment by 4 days, which cost an extra $250,000 in port handling and transport fees and a further $200,000 in
rescheduling.
Required: (a) Outline and discuss each party’s likely legal rights and liabilities in relation to the above detailed first and second shipments as governed by
Australian law, assuming CISG applies. (15 marks)
2

(b) Would China Aluminium be entitled to terminate the remainder of the contract – the August 2015 instalment – and if so what consequences would follow? (5 marks)

Question 2 20 Marks
As a variation of the facts outlined in Question 1 above, assume that Smith and China Aluminium entered into a contract, subject to Australian law, for a single
February 2015 aluminium shipment of 40,000 tonnes for US $3 million, on the same advance payment terms. A certificate of quality was to be separately issued by a
highly reputable independent company, Rockhampton Aluminium Testing. China Aluminium’s bank, Hong Kong Bank, was similarly 10 days late in delivering the requisite
irrevocable letter of credit. Due to fraud involving a Rockhampton Aluminium Testing employee and a Smith employee, a false certificate issued for the single
shipment. Further, due to fraud by a Hong Kong bank officer and a China Aluminium employee, a false letter of credit and related documents were delivered to Smith’s
Brisbane bank.
Required:
(a) How might the parties best cooperate, given the two separate but concurrent fraudulent actions? (5 marks) (b) What would be the innocent party’s legal
rights, if any, if there was issuance only of the false certificate or issuance only of the false letter of credit and related documents? (15 marks)
Question 3 10 Marks
There is a mango industry in both Australia and the Philippines. As mangoes are grown in differing, complementary seasons in these countries, they would benefit from
supporting mutual free trade in mangoes. Outline and appraise the applicable GATT/WTO, bilateral and regional free trade agreement (AANZFTA), and WTO sanitary and
phyto-sanitary (SPS) Agreement sourced rules which govern the Australia-Philippine mango trade and consider whether Australia can and should rely on strict SPS-
quarantine rules to discourage imports.
Assessment Criteria
Fail You will have shown evidence of the following:  the written expression is poor and difficult to understand  the answer is poorly organised
3
 referencing is generally inadequate  lack of familiarity with the legislation and its application  failure to identify and address the issues in the question 
reasoning and application demonstrated is poor.
Pass You will have:  made a conscientious attempt to address the topic and/or answer the question  shown evidence of having done the required reading and of having
understood the reading  presented a reasonable argument to back up your conclusions  demonstrated a reasonable level of spelling and grammatical usage  used
referencing but this may need improvement  issues that may need to be identified and addressed in more depth.
Credit You will have:  addressed the topic and/or answered the question directly  presented soundly based arguments and backed these up with reasons  gone beyond
description to analysis of key issues  used the English language well  shown evidence of reading widely  demonstrated understanding of the reading  used
referencing that is satisfactory.
Distinction You will have:  met the above criteria for a credit  demonstrated the attainment of a high degree of understanding of the concepts of the course 
demonstrated deep insight into the application of knowledge and skills acquired to complex theoretical and practical situations  used referencing correctly  made
reference to all appropriate legislation.
High Distinction
4
You will have:  met the above criteria for a distinction  demonstrated the attainment of an outstanding level of achievement regarding the objectives of this course
 demonstrated an interesting and/or original approach/idea/argument  demonstrated mastery of the relevant referencing system  ensured conclusions are backed by
well-reasoned arguments demonstrating a detailed insight and analysis of issues  ensured references are made to the appropriate legislation for particular issues.
END OF ASSESSMENT ITEM
TO GET YOUR ASSIGNMENTS DONE AT A CHEAPER PRICE,PLACE YOUR ORDER WITH US NOW