Home / Uncategorized (page 76)

Uncategorized

The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin -content– Read The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin and write a short response paper about gender spaces during that time. This paper should be no more than 1,000 words (3-4 pages) and should follow the basic essay format of an introduction (with an argument), body, and a conclusion (critical response to the validity of the work). The only source used should only be the book! Introduction: In the introduction you can summarize the book. Try to keep this to about five to seven sentences or half of a paragraph. At the end of the paragraph you need to formulate an argument that engages with the question. For example, in this paper I’m going to examine how Franklin’s book/work looks at male and females spaces by analyzing the work place, family relationships or family life and education. Next, in the body, you should have a paragraph that looks at the work place, family, and education…and the evidence should be about looking at gender…male and females spaces.Need to give me concrete examples from the book. In the conclusion,be critical of the book. What does that mean? It means that I don’t want a traditional conclusion that summarize what you just said. What I want is for you to be critical of the book as a historical source. I’m NOT looking for you to be critical of the book’s ideas, but critical of the book itself. For example: (YOU CAN’T USE THIS ONE) Franklin’s work is important in understanding early British North American life and should be considered a worthy source. However, one of the problems with Franklin’s work that we must be cautious about is the audience. In the opening page he tells the reader that the audience of the book is his son. The fact that he wrote the book for his son might mean that he inflated or exaggerated the content or at times took liberties to make himself look better in a give situation. For example: you need to give me an example in the book. Also, Franklin might have not mentioned certain events that made him look bad or affected his wife negatively because he didn’t want his son to know this information. For example, history has told us that Franklin was quite the ladies man and wasn’t always true to his marriage. You can also have a positive critique. Franklin writes well and I found the work spell binding and couldn’t put it down. The story that really pulled me in was his explanation of the Junto or reading group. How exciting that books were important status symbol in early colonial society. So, if you are critiquing the ideas, like this book shows that women were treated poorly or summarizing what you just wrote, then you are not producing what I’m looking for.

Read More »

Research Paper Special Education -content– ELSE 6023 Characteristics of Individuals With Disabilities Research Paper Overview The purpose of this project is to provide you with an opportunity to become more familiar with a particular disability/disorder. It also encourages you to access resources that you will need in the future whenever you have a child with a particular disability/disorder that you will need to research. It would be very difficult for you to learn about every possible disorder, so whenever you have a child move into your classroom with a particular one, you will want to conduct research to help you be a more effective teacher. I am asking you to go beyond what has been learned in class and via our textbook to expand your knowledge w/up-to-date information on a selected disability. Your purpose is to explain, therefore, you will be writing an informative or expository paper and will be concerned with presenting facts accurately, and completely. You will use the American Psychological Association (APA) style (latest edition) to write your paper. Steps of the Research Assignment: I. Choose a topic. What disability strongly interests you? What do you know already about the topic? What would you like to know? II. Focus your topic. Use a strategy such as clustering, listing, free writing, or brainstorming with a colleague to help you think about your topic’s many possibilities. Will you be able to find any sources on your topic? Is there a variety of resources, not just one kind? Is the topic manageable? Does the topic suit the assignment in length, time, and subject? III. List some questions you will need to answer your focus idea. Journalists’ questions such as who, what, when, where, why, and how will help you get started. Example: Thesis question – What are the characteristics and educational implications of Cystic Fibrosis in school age children? See rubric on following page Rubric Use this rubric to guide your work in this assignment. Tasks ê Exemplary Acceptable Unacceptable Introduction The introduction is engaging, states the main topic, and previews the structure of the paper. (Maximum of 5 points) The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. (Maximum of 3 points) There is no clear introduction or main topic and the structure of the paper is missing. (Maximum of 1 point) Thesis Statement/ Content Thesis clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence, which is engaging, and thought provoking. Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main ideal. (Maximum of 25 points) Thesis clearly states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. Each paragraph has sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. (Maximum of 20 points) Thesis is Incomplete and/or unfocused. Each paragraph fails to develop the main idea and/or lacks supporting detail sentences. (Maximum of 15 points) Organization The ideas are arranged logically to support the topic. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning. (Maximum of 10 points) The ideas are arranged logically to support the topic. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. (Maximum of 8 points) The writing is not always logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify, or has difficulty identifying a line of reasoning and loses interest. (Maximum of 5 points) Conclusion The conclusion is engaging and restates the thesis. (Maximum of 10 points) The conclusion restates the thesis. (Maximum of 8 points) The conclusion does not adequately restate the thesis or is Incomplete and/or unfocused. (Maximum of 5 points) Sentence Structure/ and Tone Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. They flow smoothly from one to another. The tone is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. (Maximum of 20 points) Sentences are well-phrased and there is some variety in length and structure. The flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth. The tone is generally professional. For the most part it is appropriate for an academic research paper. (Maximum of 15 points) Some sentences are awkwardly constructed or contain errors frequently enough to be a major distraction to the reader. The tone is not consistent, not professional or appropriate for an academic research paper. (Maximum of 10 points) Word Choice Word choice is consistently precise and accurate. (Maximum of 10 points) Word choice is generally good. The writer often goes beyond the generic word to find one more precise and effective. (Maximum of 8 points) Word choice is merely adequate and the range of words is limited. Some words are used inappropriately, and may be confusing to the reader. (Maximum of 5 points) Grammar, Spelling, Writing Mechanics The writing is free or almost free of errors. (Maximum of 20 points) There are occasional errors, but they don’t represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. (Maximum of 15 points) The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them. (Maximum of 10 points) Length Paper is the number of pages, or only 2-3 more, specified in the assignment. (Maximum of 10 points) Paper has fewer pages than specified in the assignment or has gone 5 or more pages over. (Maximum of 5 points) Citation Compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources is given to support claims. All cited works are done in the correct format with no errors. (Maximum of 15 points) Professional legitimate sources that support claims are generally present and attribution is, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. Some cited works are done in the correct format, but inconsistencies are evident. (Maximum of 10 points) Although attributions are occasionally given, many statements seem unsubstantiated. The reader is confused about the source of information and ideas. Few cited works are done in the correct format. (Maximum of 5 points) Quality of Bibliography Done in the correct format with no errors. References are primarily peer-reviewed professional journals or other approved sources (e.g., government documents, agency manuals). The reader is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted. (Maximum of 15 points) Done in the correct format with few (3-5) errors. Although most of the references are professionally legitimate, a few are questionable (e.g., trade books, internet sources, popular magazines). The reader is uncertain of the reliability of some of the sources. (Maximum of 10 points) Done in the correct format with many errors (6 or more). Most of the references are from sources that are not peer-reviewed and have uncertain reliability. The reader doubts the accuracy of much of the material presented. (Maximum of 5 points) APA Style APA format is used accurately and consistently in the paper and on the “references” page. (Maximum of 10 points) APA format is used with minor (2-5) errors. (Maximum of 8 points) There are frequent errors in APA format. (Maximum of 5 points) See guidelines on following page. Directions Your Topic You may choose any topic that you would like to know more about. However, if you choose a topic from the textbook, make sure that you provide a lot of different information from that included by the author. If you happen to choose the same topic as one of your colleagues, the information/format should be significantly different. Possible topics (though you are not limited to these) include: • Cri-du-Chat (also known as 5p Minus) • Angleman Syndrome • Spina Bifida or other neural tube defects • Tourette’s Syndrome • Turner’s Syndrome • Prader Willi Syndrome • Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Fetal Alcohol Effect • Failure to Thrive (FTT) • Mendelian traits Look in the appendix of your text and you will see many more. Resources You will want to use the ASU library in order to access peer-reviewed journals. I have a help sheet online that shows you how to do this. You may also use information on Web pages (on a limited basis); because many times the particular syndrome/disability will have its own organization and/or Web site. You MUST, however, have some peer-reviewed journals included. If you find that there are not any or you are unable to access them, then you need to choose another topic. Requirements: 1. Your paper should be written in APA 6th (or latest edition) Style. This means your paper must be double spaced, use Times New Roman 12 point font and have 1-inch margins. The following Web sites will help you if you are unfamiliar with the format: http://webster.commnet.edu/apa/ http://www3.wooster.edu/psychology/apacrib/apacrib.html http://www.lib.umd.edu/guides/citing_apa.html You will lose points for not following stated requirements. 2. You must have a minimum of five citations from referred journals (or books written on the subject). a. If you use the ASU online journal as outlined for you, these will be referred journals. b. Journals should include at least three references from the year 2007 or after. 3. You may use Web sites, but make sure that you cite correctly according to APA style. 4. Paper should be a minimum of seven pages not including bibliography/reference page(s). 5. Include an introduction and conclusion paragraph for your paper. For maxium points, adhere to rubric. 6. You must have a reference page. Per APA style, make sure any reference that is listed on the reference page is cited within the paper and vice-versa. 7. Whatever statements are within your research paper should have a citation from where you got your information. See APA on how to do this. Do NOT pull all of your information from one major source. Have several different sources that are equally represented. 8. Assignment will be submitted via Safe Assign. Remember, you should not have more than a sentence, or some say more than five consecutive words, that are pulled from someone else’s work without putting in quotes (See APA guidelines). The best way to avoid this is to read the information, then put it down and write what you want to say from it. This assignment is due in Session 7.

Read More »

Why does Kovalev end up respecting, or in other words, fearing his own nose? What does his nose symbolize in aspects of fear and how/why does the author portray the nose as a superior being? Is the nose scared of anything? What does this infer about Kolalev’s self-esteem and does it eventually grow? -content– Why does Kovalev end up respecting, or in other words, fearing his own nose? What does his nose symbolize in aspects of fear and how/why does the author portray the nose as a superior being? Is the nose scared of anything? What does this infer about Kolalev’s self-esteem and does it eventually grow?

Read More »

Dominant theme of The Grand Illusion 1937 -content– Pasted:1. Answer the following questions after you watch the film. Give descriptive examples from the film that illustrate your answers. (Do not turn this part in. Utilize this information in the essay).Who are the central characters and what do they represent in and of themselves and in relation to each other? What are the significances of their actions and what do the actions contribute to the story? What kind of moods or atmospheres does the film evoke? How does the movie make you feel at the end? Why?2. Incorporating your answers to the questions above, write a 500 – 750 word essay discussing the dominant theme or themes of the film. Use concrete, detailed examples from the film to support your argument. Post to the blog.

Read More »

Engaging Stakeholders -content– THIS IS FOR A PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP COURSEPost a description of the most likely key stakeholders and constituencies related to your Final Project community health issue, and explain why you chose them. Then, propose at least two strategies for engaging and organizing community partners (stakeholders) and explain how you would apply these strategies. What would you anticipate as challenges? In other words, what would you foresee as barriers to opportunities in engaging and organizing communities? Explain why these challenges and barriers might exist. Be specific and provide examples. Attached is the final project proposal which has been approved. Therefore, you will write the discussion based off of Diabetes, however, please focus on this issue in the U.S.

Read More »

Domestic Violence -content– Domestic violence is a complex and pervasive problem. Using your textbook, other academic sources and police domestic violence reports discuss the cycle of abuse and the reasons why women stay in abusive relationships. Discuss children of domestic violence and children within violent settings and what effect this has on them. Make sure to include under-reporting of domestic violence, acquaintance rape and also same-sex domestic violence. Discuss how women can find help. You may wish to contact local organizations which help victims of intimate abuse.Your paper must be at least four (4) pages and include a work cited page with at least three (3) academic research sources

Read More »

Strategic Management -content– This is a guide line of the format and instructions for the work. The company is Crescent Point Energy Corp. (stock symbol CPG). Percentages next to each section is how much that section is worth to the overall. Total word count is 5000 max (not including title/exhibits, does include tables within report) Executive Summary 5% As its name suggest, the Executive Summary should summarize the document’s contents. While this may seem obvious, far too often an Executive Summary introduces a document rather than summarizing it. To avoid this, it is imperative that you keep in mind that an Executive Summary should stand on its own. Think of it as a thumbnail image on a website. The goal in displaying a thumbnail is to reduce the download time or to allow you to see multiple images simultaneously. If you like one of the images, you can click on it to see a more detailed (i.e., higher resolution) version. The same goes for an Executive Summary. It should provide a rough idea of the document’s contents but should save the details for those who are sufficiently interested to read the entire document. It is essential that an Executive Summary not be too long. Actual length often depends on the length of the document being described. It also depends on professional norms. That said, it would be unusual for an Executive Summary to be more than 10% of the entire document. And more often than not, it would be closer to 5% of the overall length, particularly when there is a word limit on the length of the overall document (as is the case with your assignments). Introduction & Company Overview 5% The Introduction & Company Overview should introduce the reader to the report. Since your report is focused on a single organization, among other things, it should introduce that organization. In the first two assignments, the organization will not need much of an introduction since the marker will have read the case on which your assignment is based. But in Assignment 3, you cannot assume that the marker knows anything at all about the organization. For this reason, it is essential for you to provide sufficient context to make sense of the subsequent sections. Toward this end, you may also need to introduce the organization’s industry. Author(s) of analytical documents often discuss the limitations of their report. This may happen in a separate section toward the end, or even in the conclusion. However, because you are not required to provide a conclusion to your report, you ought to discuss any limitations in your Introduction & Company Overview. While you need not go into too much detail, you should at least identify the sources or assumptions on which your report depends. Additionally, you may wish to identify the sources or information that would enable you to provide a more detailed or more confident analysis. Mandate 10% mandate describes why it exists, what it hopes to accomplish, and the limits to what it will do. Every organization has a mandate and many make their mandate, or at least a portion of it, explicit in the form of Mission Statements, Visions, Core Values, etc. However, as you will learn, these public declarations often have more to do with window dressing than guiding the organization’s actions. The publicly stated Mandate is not always the same as the assumed mandate. It is important to recognize this distinction for it is the latter that you are to provide in your assignments, not the former. your mandate should be divided into four elements. The first is theMission Statement or Core Purpose. The second is the Vision and/or Major Goals. Third is the organization’s Core Values or, alternatively, its Guiding Principles. The final element is the Stakeholder Analysis. Each of the foregoing should be kept relatively brief—even briefer than they might be in reality. So while some organizations might have lengthy Mission Statements, your Mission Statement or Core Purpose should be no longer than a couple of sentences. The same is true of the Vision and/or Major Goals. Ideally, an organization’s vision will be quite detailed. However, you should need just a few sentences to convey your understanding of what the organization hopes to be and/or accomplish in the long term. This also applies to the organization’s Major Goals. If your organization has more than a handful, you need include in your assignments only the five or six that convey the most important outcomes. As with the other elements of the Mandate, the Core Values/Guiding Principles should reflect your impressions of the organization’s core values. This is particularly important if your organization has a Code of Conduct, which is often quite detailed. It’s up to you to distill this code into a handful of values or principles that convey how this organization expects its representatives to conduct themselves. Somewhere between five and ten values or principles ought to suffice within the context of your assignments. Stakeholder Analysis is the final element of the Mandate. A full-blown stakeholder analysis can be a report unto itself. For your assignments, all that is required is a list of the most important stakeholders and their most important implications for the organization you are analyzing. External Analysis 15% An External Analysis is a review of the organization’s industry, as well as the societal forces that shape it. Usually, the objective of an external analysis is to identify an organization’s opportunities and threats. When an organization can increase the size of its operations or accrue more benefits from its existing operations, it has opportunities. When there is potential for reduced activity levels or for fewer benefits from these activities, the organization is facing threats. Needless to say, the goal of every organization is to exploit its opportunities and eliminate its threats. each of these tools should be utilized (strategic groups – the industry life cycle-macroenvironment) The usefulness of a particular tool will vary depending on the organization and its circumstances. Nevertheless, whenever possible, and to the degree possible, you should attempt to use each tool. That said, you should not include the results of these attempts in the body of your assignments. If included at all, they should be in Exhibits at the end of the report. In the body of your report, you should instead provide a well-argued statement of the organization’s opportunities and threats that builds on the analyses you undertook with the tools from Lesson 3. The manner in which you organize the External Analysis section is up to you. You will need to consider the information you have at your disposal and how much space you intend to devote to this section. This decision, in turn, will depend on how much space you think you need for other sections. So before you write this section, make sure you have a clear vision of the structure of your report, its argument, and the emphasis to be given to each section. Internal Analysis 15% In contrast with an External Analysis, which examines the world of which the organization is a part, an Internal Analysis looks inward at the organization itself. Ideally, it provides an objective assessment of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses. Needless to say, strengths and weaknesses are relative measures and, for this reason, an Internal Analysis does make reference to the world outside the organization. Even so, the emphasis is decidedly internal with the Internal Analysis being, on the one hand, an inventory of what the organization has and, on the other, an inventory of what it can do (and how well it does it). Some of the tools with which an Internal Analysis is carried out are described in Lesson 4. As with the External Analysis, the utility of these tools will vary from case to case. And here as well, you are not expected to include the raw results of the tools’ application in your reports. Instead, you are once again expected to sift through these results and, after considering how much space you will devote to the Internal Analysis, to decide which information you are going to include. As above, how this information is organized is up to you. In the end, what you will be evaluated on is the specific strengths and weaknesses you identify and the level of support that you provide for them. Strategic Options 20% In this section, you are expected to provide three distinct strategies for the organization being analyzed along with a balanced assessment of each strategy. In the context of this section, strategy is used in the broadest sense. In fact, it might even be better to invoke the concept of a “business model” here, provided that it is used in the broad sense described in your textbook. Whatever the term, you are required to put forward three distinct directions in which the organization might go in its efforts to carry out its mission and realize its vision. Strategies: 1: Functional-level strategies: Strategy aimed at improving the effectiveness of a company’s operations and its ability to attain superior efficiency, quality, innovation, and customer responsiveness. 2: Flexible production technology (lean production): A range of technologies designed to reduce setup times for complex equipment, increase the use of individual machines through better scheduling, and improve quality control at all stages of the manufacturing process. 3: Marketing strategy: The position that a company takes with regard to pricing, promotion, advertising, product design, and distribution. 4: Human resources 5: Supply Chain management Briefly, these include the differentiators, the arenas, the vehicles, the staging, and the economic model. If not explicitly, then implicitly you will describe each of these for each strategy. It is also expected that the strategies you propose will be compatible with the organization’s mandate and its situation. And in that regard, it is assumed that you will provide an assessment of each strategy that allows its pros and cons to be compared with those of the other strategies. Recommendation and Implementation 20% In the Strategic Options section of your reports, you are expected to identify several options for the organization being analyzed. In this final section of your report, you are expected to recommend one of those options and then elaborate on it. More specifically, you are expected to provide some guidance with respect to how the recommended option ought to be implemented. In this section, you need not review the details you provided in the previous section. Nevertheless, you may end up doing so as you elaborate on the strategy you have recommended. The goal in this section is to address implementation issues. On one side of the coin are the things that the organization will need to do, and for these you will draw heavily on the ideas of (diversification, sunk costs, multidivisional structures, integration)On the other side of the coin are the things that can go wrong, meaning the things the organization needs to watch out for. What are the key risks? What could stop the strategy you have proposed from being successful? And what, if anything, can be done in the event that something does go wrong? The challenge in writing this section will be deciding what should and should not be included. You could easily use up all of the space in your report (and much, much more) on implementation issues alone. Thus, you will need to have a clear sense of the amount of space you can devote to this section and the information that ought to be included. This decision will depend in part on the organization being analyzed. If it’s a very large organization, the implementation effort may be outlined at a very high level of abstraction. If it’s a small organization, it may get into specific details regarding particular individuals, processes, or products. Exhibits Your assignment may contain up to ten pages of exhibits. These exhibits will not be marked per se and, in fact, may not even be examined. Nevertheless, they could have an influence on your mark if the marker decides that something you suggested in the body of your assignment would be significant if it were better substantiated. For example, you may wish to provide pro forma financial statements as an exhibit in order to support your earnings projections. As with the word count, if you exceed the limit of ten pages of exhibits, your assignment will be returned to you unmarked. And should this happen more than once, you will receive a grade of zero on the assignment.

Read More »

Medication Safety in Nursing -content– Transitions Paper Assignment Guidelines PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to explore a critical concept in nursing. The student will be able to demonstrate application of information literacy and ability to utilize resources (library, writing center, SmartThinking, located within the Tutor Source tab under Course Home, APA resources, Turnitin, and others) through literature search and writing the paper. COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 2: Identify characteristics of professional behavior including emotional intelligence, Communication, and conflict resolution. CO 3: Demonstrate information literacy and the ability to utilize resources. DUE DATES Please refer to the Course Calendar for exact due dates of the draft for peer feedback exercise and for the final paper. REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES Pick one of the following topics and find a scholarly nursing journal article (published within the last five years) that discusses this nursing topic. The topics are • safety; • delegation; • prioritization; and • caring. After you find a scholarly nursing journal article using the Chamberlain library resources, you will complete a one-page summary and reflection on the article. The paper should be completed in APA format and include the following. • A cover page (not included in the page number requirement) • A reference page (not included in the page number requirement) • One direct quote from one of your references, appropriately cited in the body of your paper • One indirect quote (or paraphrased reference) appropriately cited in the body of your paper • Citations and references in APA format TOTAL POINTS: 150 POINTS Best Practices in Preparing the Paper Utilize resources available to you to assist with finding appropriate literature and articles from professional nursing journals relevant to your topic and preparing for and writing the paper (e.g., SmartThinking, located within the Tutor Source tab under Course Home, writing center, Turnitin, APA manual, and online resources). The grading rubric will help you understand how your faculty will be evaluating your paper. Use it as a checklist to make sure that you have included all the important elements. Grading Criteria for Transitions Paper Assignment Category Points % Description: See Rubric for Details Introduction 20 13% • Clearly states the purpose or focus of paper with conceptual key points to be discussed and engages the interest of the reader Body of Paper 60 40% • Complete, well-developed discussion of key points • Logical development of ideas with information clear and accurate, supported by examples from personal and/or professional experiences • Perception: Student provides own perspectives on the topic; reflective and insightful Conclusion 30 20% • Summarizes ideas presented in the body of paper in a clear and concise manner • Provides reader with a thought, idea, or key message Writing Style, APA Format, and References 40 27% • Proper grammar and mechanics • Correct spelling • APA Format: Margins, font style and size, spacing, citations, title page, and reference page • One direct quote with in-text citation • One indirect quote with in-text citation • References from nursing journals (published within the last five years) TOTAL 150 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.   Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance C (76–83%) Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance F (0–75%) Introduction 20 • Introduction of the paper is clearly presented. • Introduction clearly establishes the purpose of the paper and key points to be discussed. • The introduction immediately captures the reader’s interest. 19–20 points • Introduction of the paper is clearly presented. • Introduction presents the general purpose of the paper and points to be discussed. • Introduction is able to gain general interest of the reader. 17–18 points • Introduction of the paper is present. • Introduction presents the general purpose of the paper, but key points are not clearly presented. • Introduction is able to gain general interest of the reader. 16 points • Introduction of the paper is not clearly presented, irrelevant to the topic, or is absent. • Introduction does not present the purpose of the paper or key points to be discussed. • Introduction does not capture the reader’s interest. 0–15 points Body of Paper 60 • Complete, well-developed discussion of key points strongly supports the purpose or main idea of the paper. • There is logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information • Ideas and statements are supported by three or more examples from personal and/or professional experiences. • Perception: Student provides own perspectives on the topic: reflective, insightful, and original. 56–60 points • Complete discussion of key points generally supports the purpose or main idea of the paper. • There is logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information. • Ideas and statements are supported by two examples from personal and/or professional experiences. • Perception: Student provides own perspectives on the topic: reflective and insightful. 51–55 points • General discussion of key points somewhat supports the purpose or main idea of the paper. • There is some logical development of ideas, somewhat clear information; some information is inaccurate. • Ideas and statements are supported by one example from personal and/or professional experiences. • Perception: Student generally provides own perspectives on the topic; somewhat reflective and insightful. 46–50 points • There is vague or minimal discussion of key points, which does not support the purpose or main idea of the paper. • There is poor development of ideas; information is unclear and/or inaccurate. • Ideas or statements are not supported by examples from personal and/or professional experiences. • Perception: Student does not provide own perspectives on the topic: lacks reflection and insight. 0–45 points Conclusion 30 • Conclusion of the paper is clearly and concisely presented. • Conclusion clearly establishes key points discussed in the paper. • The conclusion leaves a strong impression on the reader (important thought, idea, or key message). 28–30 points • Conclusion of the paper is clearly and concisely presented. • Conclusion generally states key points discussed in the paper. • The conclusion leaves a general impression on the reader (important thought, idea, or key message). 25–27 points • Conclusion of the paper is present. • Conclusion vaguely states key points discussed in the paper. • The conclusion leaves a vague impression on the reader (important thought, idea, or key message). 23–24 points • Conclusion of the paper is not clearly presented. • Conclusion does not present key points discussed in the paper. • The conclusion does not leave an impression on the reader (important thought, idea, or key message). 0–22 points Writing Style, APA Format, and References 40 Writing Style • Paper has correct use of Standard English grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure. • There are no spelling or typographical errors. • Paper is clearly organized around required components. • Information flows in a logical sequence that is easy for the audience to follow. APA Format and References • There is correct and appropriate use of margins, spacing, font, and headers. • Document setup includes title and reference pages in correct APA format. • Citation of sources included in the body of the paper uses correct APA format for direct and indirect quotes. • Sources are cited correctly on the Reference page. All elements of each reference are included in the correct order. • All information taken from the source, even if summarized, must be cited and listed on the Reference page. • All sources used are nursing journals published within the last five years. 37–40 points Writing Style • There are one to three minor errors in use of Standard English grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure. • There are one to two spelling or typographical errors. • Paper is organized and generally easy to read and follow. APA Format and References • There is incorrect format for any one of the items: margins, spacing, font, and headers. • Document setup includes title and reference pages, with one to two errors in APA format. • Citation of sources is included in the body of the paper for direct and indirect quotes, with one to two errors in APA format. • Sources are cited on the Reference page. There are one to two errors in elements of each reference. • All information taken from source, even if summarized, must be cited and listed on the Reference page. • All sources used are nursing journals published within the last five years. 34–36 points Writing Style • There is one major error or there are more than four minor errors in use of Standard English grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure. • There are three to four spelling or typographical errors. • Paper is organized and generally easy to read and follow. APA Format and References • Incorrect format is used for any two of the items: margins, spacing, font, and headers. • Document setup includes title and reference pages, with three errors in APA format. • Citation of sources is included in the body of the paper for direct and indirect quotes, with three errors in APA format. • Sources are cited on the Reference page. There are three errors in elements of each reference. • Some information taken from sources (even if summarized) is not cited and/or listed on the Reference page. • Not all sources used are from nursing journals published within the last five years. 31–33 points Writing Style • Language needs development. • There are more than four spelling and/or grammar errors. • Paper has poorly organized thoughts and concepts; it is difficult to follow logic. APA Format and References • Incorrect format is used for three or more of the items: margins, spacing, font, and headers. • Document setup includes title and reference pages, with four or more errors in APA format. • Citation of sources is included in the body of the paper for direct and indirect quotes, with four or more errors in APA format. • Sources are cited on the Reference page. There are four or more errors in elements of each reference. • Some information taken from sources (even if summarized) is not cited and/or listed on the Reference page. • Not all sources used are from nursing journals published within the last five years. 0–30 points FACULTY FEEDBACK FORM Category Points Comments Introduction 20 Body of Paper 60 Conclusion 30 Writing Style, APA Format, and References 40 TOTAL 150

Read More »

WPMessenger