Chapter 980 Sexual Predator Law in Wisconsin: Does it work, Does it actually catch the group it targets or is the law an unfounded answer to public outcry

Chapter 980 Sexual Predator Law in Wisconsin: Does it work, Does it actually catch the group it targets or is the law an unfounded answer to public outcry

The paper needs to be in a Legal Memo / Legal Brief type format, citations to research need to follow Blue Book citation procedure (i.e. law review article), Introduction paragraph with clear topic sentence and road map on what paper will discuss, Main Section (i.e. argument) to include very strong analytical look at the current research, specifically statistical research on Wisconsin’s Chapter 980 law, the group its serving, the statutory standards, the assessment tools, how the program has changed and evolved, and comparing Wisconsin’s program to the Sexual Violent Persons laws in Washington, Texas, Florida and Minnesota, Include counter-arguments, Include where changes should be made or where the laws are heading, last paragraph should include a Brief Conclusion. What’s the next step, What should happen from where things are currently. My opinion is Wisconsin’s sexual predator laws fall in the median of harsh punishment type program to the purely community based program in Texas. The variation in the statutory standard (burden of proof) is significant in why there is a difference in the application of the programs between the different states in the US. Further, the actual risk of recidivism is so minute to begin with that once you put a person through sexual predator commitment are you really significantly reducing that person’s risk – statistically speaking
FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENTS TO BE DONE AT A CHEAPER PRICE PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US NOW