Home / Essays / Criteria Weighting NN (Fail) PP (Pass) CR (Credit) DN (Distinction) HD (High Distinction)

Criteria Weighting NN (Fail) PP (Pass) CR (Credit) DN (Distinction) HD (High Distinction)

In your essay you have:
Demonstrates Failed to respond to all Responded to most Responded to all Responded to all questions/ Comprehensively and accurately
clear and relevant questions/directions questions/directions. questions/directions. directions to a high standard. responded to all questions/
knowledge and 60% sufficiently or Demonstrated Demonstrated solid Demonstrated very good directions. Demonstrated
understanding of accurately. Paper is not reasonable knowledge knowledge and knowledge and understanding exceptional knowledge and
the case through aligned with the and understanding understanding through an through a clear and logical understanding through a detailed
the logical and clinical reasoning cycle through a satisfactory accurate application of the application of the clinical and logical application of the
effective or demonstrated poor application of the clinical clinical reasoning cycle to reasoning cycle to the case. clinical reasoning cycle to the case.
application of the knowledge, reasoning cycle to the the case.
specified understanding and/or case. Scope for further
components of application of the cycle depth.
the Clinical to the case.
Reasoning Cycle
In your essay you have:
Substantiates key Used few or no Used minimal research Integrated some relevant Very good integration of recent Extensively integrated recent and
points and ideas references to support and/or literature to references to support your and credible research and relevant literature throughout your
through 20% your discussion or support your discussion. discussion and literature to support your discussion. Referenced high level
appropriate substantiate key Utilised mainly credible substantiate key points discussion and substantiate key evidence to support and
reference to points. Failed to use sources, but scope for and ideas. Used a variety points and ideas. Used a variety substantiate key points and ideas.
recent research credible academic further integration of of scholarly sources. of scholarly sources. Utilised a variety of scholarly
and literature sources. the literature. sources.
In your essay you have:
Writes clearly and Failed to present Written reasonably Presented a clear and Presented a well-structured Consistently demonstrated a high
logically in an information in an clearly with academic logical discussion in an discussion in academic style, level of academic writing. The
appropriate 20% academic style, with style and structure being appropriate academic with a clear and logical flow. paper demonstrated careful
academic style numerous spelling, mostly evident. Some style. Minimal spelling or Good planning was evident. planning, with a clear and logical
with correct grammatical and/or incorrect spelling, grammatical errors, and Used correct spelling and structure that was virtually free
spelling, grammar terminology errors. The grammar and/or mostly suitable use of grammar, and appropriate from spelling, grammatical and/or
and clinical paper lacked clear and terminology. Some terminology. clinical terminology. terminology errors. Harvard
terminology logical structure and errors in the application Accurately referenced Provided a comprehensive referencing style was accurately
(including correct written expression. of Harvard referencing the majority sources reference list and accurately used in-text and was matched to
Harvard Used incorrect style. using the Harvard style. referenced most sources using an extensive reference list.
referencing style) referencing style or the Harvard style.
made a large number
of referencing errors .

TO HAVE YOUR ASSIGNMENTS DONE AT A CHEAPER PRICE, PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US NOW.

Leave a Reply

WPMessenger