PARA2006 ASSIGNMENT ESSAY MARKING RUBRIC 2015

GRADE: / 100
INTRODUCTION: /5
Grade Key points Grade
F
• overview of the case not provided, • no outline of the key points to be discussed, • unclear explanation of key signs and symptoms, • Lack of identified provisional mental health diagnosis
P
• overview of the case provided, • key points mentioned but not clearly identified and linked to relevance for the case, • signs and symptoms identified but not explained, • provisional mental health diagnosis identified but not clearly linked to the case
CR
• overview of the case provided, • key points identified with links to the case, • signs & symptoms identified and explained, • provisional mental health diagnosis identified and linked to the case
DN
• Succinct & clear overview of the case provided, • key points identified and explained with links to the case, • signs & symptoms succinctly identified and explained, • Provisional mental health diagnosis identified excellent links established to the case. HD • as DN above, but with outstanding synthesis and exploration of concepts COMMENT:
DISCUSSION: /30
Grade Key points Marks awarded
F
• no clear rationale provided for the provisional diagnosis, • no description or outline of the mental state examination, • no links made between the case and the MSE, • no critical discussion of the diagnostic criteria and literature relevant to the case and diagnosis
P
• Rationale provided but not well defined or explained, • key features of the MSE outlined but not discussed, • links are made between the case and the MSE but not explained or critically discussed, • limited links to literature and the criteria not discussed in depth.
CR
• Rationale defined but not discussed in depth, • key features of the MSE outlined and discussed, • links are made between the case and the MSE with explanation but not critically discussed, • links to current literature and the criteria discussed.
DN
• Succinct & clear rationale that is well explained and discussed, • key features of the MSE clearly outlined and critically discussed, • links are made between the case and the MSE which are explained and critically discussed, • excellent links to current literature and the criteria discussed. HD • as DN above, but with outstanding synthesis and exploration of concepts COMMENT:

DISCUSSION: /40
Grade Key points Marks awarded
F
• no clear discussion of the biological, social and psychological factors, • no current evidence (research) provided into the disorder, • no links made between the literature and short and long term care, • no critical discussion of the current practices and their benefits or limitations, • no critical discussion of the of communication and rapport building techniques.
P
• an outline of the biological, social and psychological factors provided but no explanation or discussion of those factors, • limited current evidence (research) provided into the disorder, • links made between the literature and short and long term care but lacking in-depth discussion, • an outline of current practices with limited discussion of their benefits or limitations with few links to the case and diagnosis, • no critical discussion of the of communication and rapport building techniques.
CR
• the biological, social and psychological factors explained and discussed, • current evidence (research) provided into the disorder, • links made between the literature and short and long term care with discussion, • an outline of current practices with discussion of their benefits and limitations with links to the case and diagnosis, • discussion of the communication and rapport building techniques.
DN
• the biological, social and psychological factors explained with critical discussion of those factors, • current evidence (research) provided into the disorder and incorporated, • clear links made between the literature and short and long term care with critical discussion, • current practices critically discussed with benefits and limitations linked to the case and diagnosis, • critical discussion of the of communication and rapport building techniques. HD • as DN above, but with outstanding synthesis and exploration of concepts COMMENT:
CONCLUSION: /10 Grade Key points Marks awarded
F
• succinct summary of key points not provided, • concluding statements and discussion not provided, • supporting evidence not summarised.
P
• summary of key points, • concluding statements and discussion provided, • supporting evidence not summarised.
CR
• succinct summary of key points provided, • concluding statements and discussion provided, • supporting evidence summarised.
DN
• succinct summary of key points provided, • clear and succinct concluding statements and discussion provided, • clear and succinct summary of supporting evidence. HD • as DN above, but with outstanding summary of key discussion and evidence COMMENT:
STRUCTURE, PRESENTATION & EVIDENCE OF RESEARCH: /15
Grade Key Points Marks awarded • The content is structured in a logical manner and directly related to the case. • Paragraphs and sentences are well structured with minimal repetition and linked to the subject matter. • Clear development of themes and/or discussion “arguments” based on critical review of the literature • Clear writing style and easily read. • Complete sentences and paragraphs with correct grammar and spelling. • Within 10% of word limit • Researched material is incorporated well into the discussion, cited correctly and an accurate reference list conforming to Author-Date (Harvard) System is provided. • peer reviewed sources used with limited use of textbook s (no web sites) • The use of primary references to support the critical evaluation of the case and concepts discussed • Clear use of the students own words when discussing referenced material, NO evidence of plagiarism COMMENT:
TO GET YOUR ASSIGNMENTS DONE AT A CHEAPER PRICE,PLACE YOUR ORDER WITH US NOW