Home / Essays / Urethral dilatation versus urethroplasty managementItreatment for bulbar urethral strictures in male-

Urethral dilatation versus urethroplasty managementItreatment for bulbar urethral strictures in male-

Urethral dilatation versus urethroplasty managementItreatment for bulbar urethral strictures in male-
Paper details:
Critically analyse recent research and theoretical evidence relevant to the chosen competence I common theme within the outcome criteria. The Literature
review word limit is 3000 words (+I- 1096).
The Literature review should include the following:-
1. The introduction should focus clearly on the chosen topic, including a justification for the choice of topic based on the competence! theme.
2. Critically analyse recent research and theoretical evidence relevant to the topic in order to develop a logical and coherent discussion. This should include
analytical comment, critical evaluation with respect to facts, principles, theories and research techniques where appropriate.
it needs to be studies you compare are using patients with similar types of stricture so that you are comparing treatment of the like with like- Choose and do
a thorough search of the literature to choose the articles to critique-
3. Critically evaluate and integrate the findings on how applying this new knowledge may improve client care within that area-
4. Your work should be logical in progression and must be referenced according to the Harvard system-
5. The word limit for this assignment is 3000 words (+I- 1096).
Structure
It is important to present a clear structure and a well-developed argument within your paper. You should establish a clear introduction that is overtly
signposted and sets the scene, informing the reader what you are going to do. The main body of the text is where you do what you have just said you would
do in the introduction. Your arguments should unfold throughout this section of your assignment- You should order the main points, presenting the
information fully and accurately. Your assignment should end with a conclusion. This draws together what you have said in the main body and should enable
the reader to understand what your final position on the question is. It should sum up the arguments you have made in the text, without adding any new
material. It is worth spending some time refining your conclusion since this section more than any other sums up what you have to say for the reader.
In accordance with the Academic regulation you must ensure that confidentiality is maintained at all times. Students who breach confidentiality by clearly
identifying people such as children I young people and I or families will be awarded a mark of 0%.
Students who identify a Hospital I Primary Care Trust or their place of work will be deducted 10% of their total mark-
Journals
lntemational Journal of Urological Nursing
Ill b
A J;- ,, 10:18 PM
5′ “‘” ‘ x 1 arm/2017

Leave a Reply

WPMessenger